Top
🚀 Introducing Xnap - A MetaMask integration for Nano The good news: Manage your $XNO directly in MetaMask: - Send/Receive XNO - Multiple accounts - Nano Internet IDs - Custom RPC nodes - SDK for web developers (request txs, signing) Preview: https://xnap.xyz For the (kind of) bad news: - MetaMask requires 3rd-party security audit for listing - audit costs anywhere from $3-15k, although for our case likely on the lower end - Code will be open-sourced in ~2 weeks once final refactoring & testing are done, which is when I'll start asking auditors for quotes - Fund address if you want to help: nano_3xnapsm113djnwnu6nd97hckkitzcu6b1gizhdxxhpqwzknj3tm1ab1meum9
For the vote republishing issue I mentioned yesterday during the dev space, I implemented a proof of concept that I think could work. I did 2 rounds of spam. Default node and Default + PoC. The results show, with Deafult node I'm republishing at my configured bandwidth limit (10MB). With the PoC in place, I'm down to ~1.5MB outgoing traffic. From traces I could see that we are publishing the same vote multiple times instead of just once. Even though there is a test to only a vote the first time it's processed, so it should not happen in theory. My PoC introduces a "vote_spacer_by_signature". So If we've recently rebroadcast a confirm_ack with a specific signature, we won't republish again for 5 minutes. These are early results, and the final approach might change. Still wanted to share. 🙂
I might be able to get access to get Nano on Elon Musk's radar when the time is right
Yes, the first version will certainly be an xUSDT or xUSDC, backed 100% by a corresponding public reserve. This will probably be centralized on nanswap or with the help of partners. The xUSD, xEUR, xBTC, etc are the long-term project.
My goal is not to try to convince anyone here. My goal is to try to help get Nano adoption
Network Stats
Confirmations (24h)
27,993
Settlement (24h)
$3,759,239
Tx Fees (24h)
$0
Tx Throughput
0.9 CPS
Tx Speed (24h)
817.5 ms
Tx Speed (1h)
872 ms
Tx Speed (10m)
891 ms
Unconfirmed Blocks
0
Online Stake
62.0%
Principal Reps
64
Principal Rep Minimum Weight
83.4K
Total Reps (24h)
85
Peers
194
Reps to Confirm
21
Reps to Censor or Stall
5
Energy Usage (TDP) (24h)
108.55 kWh
NanoTicker
Development Events
gr0vity-dev-bot
commented on issue
#4842
2d
gr0vity-dev-bot
commented on issue
#4841
2d
Exxenoz
opened pr
#4842
2d
Exxenoz
opened pr
#4841
2d
pwojcikdev
pr review dismissed
#4833
2d
Langit55
commented on issue
#2864
2d
Hardcoding-1992
forked
Hardcoding-1992
1w
github-actions
created tag
1w
gordonshumwayalf
forked
gordonshumwayal
1w
not-Ian
pr review commented
#4835
1w
not-Ian
commented on pr review
#4835
1w
pwojcikdev
pushed commit to refs/heads/deve
1w
pwojcikdev
closed pr
#4837
1w
pwojcikdev
pushed commit to refs/heads/deve
1w
pwojcikdev
closed pr
#4836
1w
RepresentativeIssueLast OnlineWeight% Online WeightBehind
nano.strnmn.me 🌿
behind
467,9310.56 %3,311,754
NanoBrasil 🇧🇷
behind
247,1680.30 %224,005
Wirex
behind
15,1800.02 %777,308
Kraken
overweight
15,776,07318.92 %22
Natrium
overweight
6,885,8458.26 %7
nano_3oxhohaxp9...
overweight
4,203,9005.04 %26
Madora
overweight
3,428,5754.11 %26
Show 1 more
Trending
P2P and Store of Value
Daily General Discussion - February 11, 2025
The 'long term TA' guy: The run is starting, but keep yourself rational
Daily General Discussion - February 10, 2025
General Info and Weekly Discussion
Nano currency - where are we now
How to complete a transfer to a paper wallet?
Daily General Discussion - February 09, 2025